MA(9): $102.22
MA(20): $100.93
MACD: 1.6754
Signal: 2.0092
Days since crossover: 1
Value: 47.7
Category: NEUTRAL
Current: 11,557
Avg (20d): 251,496
Ratio: 0.05
%K: 42.19
%D: 58.04
ADX: 15.2
+DI: 22.2
-DI: 25.72
Value: -57.81
Upper: 109.96
Middle: 100.93
Lower: 91.9
| Category | Current | Last Week | Last Year | 3 Yr Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude Production (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 13702.0 | 13710.0 | 13387.0 | 12930.67 |
| Crude Imports (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 6016.0 | 5901.0 | 5841.0 | 6200.67 |
| Crude Exports (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 5604.0 | 5492.0 | 3369.0 | 4262.0 |
| Refinery Inputs (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 16319.0 | 16399.0 | 16401.0 | 16347.0 |
| Net Imports (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 412.0 | 409.0 | 2472.0 | 1938.67 |
| Commercial Crude Stocks (Thousand Barrels) | 445013.0 | 452876.0 | 441830.0 | 452390.33 |
| Crude & Products Total Stocks (Thousand Barrels) | 1601408.0 | 1620349.0 | 1617795.0 | 1610802.33 |
| Gasoline Stocks (Thousand Barrels) | 214163.0 | 215711.0 | 224706.0 | 222873.67 |
| Distillate Stocks (Thousand Barrels) | 102906.0 | 102534.0 | 103553.0 | 108849.33 |
Brent crude (JUL 26) settled at $105.02, change $-6.26. WTI crude (JUL 26) settled at $98.26, change $-5.89. The Brent-WTI spread is currently $6.76 (Brent premium of $6.76). The Brent-WTI spread reflects differences in global vs. U.S. supply/demand dynamics, geopolitics, and transportation costs.
In January, the OPEC Reference Basket (ORB) value rose by $0.61/b, month-on-month (m-o-m), to average $62.31/b. The ICE Brent front-month contract increased by $3.10/b, m-o-m, to average $64.73/b, while the NYMEX WTI front-month contract rose by $2.39/b, m-o-m, to average $60.26/b. The GME Oman front-month contract also saw an increase of $0.83/b, m-o-m, to average $62.79/b. The Brent–WTI front-month spread rose by $0.71/b, m-o-m, to average $4.47/b.
The forward curves for all major crude benchmarks strengthened, with the front end of the curves for both ICE Brent and NYMEX WTI moving into stronger backwardation. This shift was supported by oil supply outages, easing selling pressure from speculators, and robust physical market fundamentals. The forward curve for GME Oman remained relatively unchanged, m-o-m. Speculative sentiment turned bullish, with hedge funds and other money managers significantly increasing their net long positions.
The global economic growth forecasts remain unchanged from last month’s assessment at 3.1% in 2026 and 3.2% in 2027. The US economic growth forecast has been revised slightly up to 2.2% for 2026, while it remains at 2% for 2027. In the Eurozone, the economic growth forecasts are steady at 1.2% for both years. Japan's economic growth forecasts are also unchanged at 0.9% for both 2026 and 2027. China's growth forecast remains at 4.5% for both years, while India's is projected at 6.6% for 2026 and 6.5% for 2027. Brazil's economic growth is expected to be 2.0% for 2026 and 2.2% for 2027, while Russia's forecasts are at 1.3% for 2026 and 1.5% for 2027.
Trade normalization and monetary policy impacts are expected to influence these growth trajectories, particularly in major economies.
The global oil demand growth forecast for 2026 remains at 1.4 mb/d, y-o-y, unchanged from last month’s assessment. The OECD is expected to increase by 0.15 mb/d, while the non-OECD is forecast to grow by approximately 1.2 mb/d. In 2027, global oil demand is projected to grow by about 1.3 mb/d, y-o-y, with the OECD expected to grow by 0.1 mb/d and the non-OECD by about 1.2 mb/d.
Key demand drivers include economic growth in emerging markets, while constraints may arise from geopolitical tensions and shifts in energy consumption patterns.
Non-DoC liquids production is forecast to grow by about 0.6 mb/d, y-o-y, in 2026, primarily driven by Brazil, Canada, the US, and Argentina. This growth is expected to continue into 2027. Natural gas liquids (NGLs) and non-conventional liquids from DoC countries are projected to grow by 0.1 mb/d, y-o-y, in both 2026 and 2027. In January, crude oil production by DoC countries decreased by 439 tb/d, m-o-m, to average about 42.45 mb/d.
In January, refining margins declined across all reported trading hubs due to stronger feedstock prices and seasonal demand pressures. In the US Gulf Coast, losses were attributed to increased availability of heavy crude supplies, affecting fuel oil and gasoil crack spreads. In Rotterdam, key product margins fell, with gasoline leading the decline. Singapore experienced similar declines driven by elevated gasoline and jet/kerosene supplies.
Dirty tanker spot freight rates had a strong start in January, supported by weather disruptions and geopolitical uncertainties. VLCC spot freight rates reached their highest levels for the month in over a decade, up by 64%, y-o-y. Suezmax rates rose amid weather disruptions, while Aframax rates also performed strongly, with cross-Med rates reaching a 10-year high. In the clean tanker market, rates increased significantly, particularly on the Middle East-to-East route, which was up by 17%, m-o-m.
US crude imports averaged 6.3 mb/d in January, consistent with the five-year average. Crude exports rose by almost 0.2 mb/d, m-o-m, to average 4.2 mb/d, driven by higher flows to Europe and Africa. In Japan, crude imports surged to just under 3 mb/d, the highest since March 2020. China's crude imports reached a record high of 13.2 mb/d in December, while India's crude imports remained elevated at 5.1 mb/d despite a slight decline.
Preliminary December 2025 data show OECD commercial oil inventories rose by 6.5 mb, m-o-m, to stand at 2,845 mb. This level is 89.9 mb higher, y-o-y, and 44.1 mb above the latest five-year average, but 81.0 mb below the 2015–2019 average. Crude stocks fell by 2.1 mb, while product stocks increased by 8.6 mb, m-o-m. OECD crude oil commercial stocks stood at 1,363 mb, which is 75.5 mb higher, y-o-y, and 17.5 mb above the latest five-year average.
The demand for DoC crude in 2026 remains at 43.0 mb/d, which is about 0.6 mb/d higher than that of 2025. For 2027, the demand for DoC crude is also unchanged at 43.6 mb/d, reflecting a similar increase.
| Year | World Demand (mb/d) | Non-DoC Supply (mb/d) | DoC Requirement (mb/d) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 106.5 | 63.5 | 43.0 |
| 2027 | 107.9 | 64.3 | 43.6 |
The analysis indicates a supply-demand gap for DoC crude, with a requirement of 43.0 mb/d in 2026 against a non-DoC supply of 63.5 mb/d, resulting in a healthy buffer. The market balance suggests that production decisions will need to be strategically aligned to meet the projected demand growth while considering the evolving global economic landscape.
CFTC Commitment of Traders Report (Disaggregated) as of 2026-05-12
Crude Oil Positioning (WTI-PHYSICAL - NYMEX):
Open Interest: 2,081,927 contracts (+14,100)
Managed Money Net Position: 72,801 contracts (3.5% of OI)
Weekly Change in Managed Money Net: +2,010 contracts
Producer/Merchant Net Position: 357,407 contracts
Swap Dealer Net Position: -553,541 contracts
Market Sentiment (based on Managed Money): Bullish and Strengthening
Positioning Analysis (Managed Money): Normal Range
Key Takeaways:
- Managed Money traders are large speculators, often driving price trends in Crude Oil.
- Producer/Merchant positions primarily reflect hedging activity.
- Swap Dealers act as intermediaries.
- Extreme positioning by Managed Money can indicate potential market reversals.
- CFTC data reports positions as of the report date, usually released each Friday.
About Disaggregated CoT Reports:
The Disaggregated CoT report provides a more detailed breakdown of futures market open interest.
It categorizes traders into: Producer/Merchant/Processor/User (Commercials), Swap Dealers, Managed Money (Speculators), and Other Reportables.
| Date | Prediction | Lower Bound | Upper Bound |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-22 | $97.57 | $88.76 | $106.39 |
| 2026-05-23 | $97.76 | $88.95 | $106.57 |
| 2026-05-24 | $97.63 | $88.82 | $106.44 |
| 2026-05-25 | $96.83 | $88.02 | $105.65 |
| 2026-05-26 | $96.71 | $87.9 | $105.52 |
The recent price movements indicate a bullish sentiment in the market, particularly with the $62.31/b average for the OPEC Reference Basket and a $64.73/b average for ICE Brent. The Brent-WTI spread has increased to $4.47/b, suggesting that the market is favoring Brent over WTI, which could present short-term trading opportunities if this trend continues.
The strengthening of the forward curves into backwardation indicates potential support levels around the recent highs, while volatility may arise from geopolitical tensions and supply disruptions. Traders should monitor risk factors such as weather conditions affecting tanker operations and geopolitical developments in the Middle East that may impact supply.
With OPEC's crude oil production decreasing by 439 tb/d in January, producers should consider adjusting their production planning accordingly. The balance of supply and demand remains tight, with demand for DoC crude projected to rise to 43.0 mb/d in 2026. This could lead to favorable pricing conditions, but producers must also be aware of inventory levels that are currently above the five-year average, which may pressure prices if not managed.
Hedging strategies should be evaluated in light of the bearish sentiment reflected in news analysis, particularly as refining margins are under pressure. Monitoring market sentiment and adjusting hedging positions accordingly will be crucial to mitigate potential downside risks.
As crude prices hover around $60.26/b for WTI, consumers should prepare for input cost fluctuations that may occur as supply dynamics evolve. The current geopolitical landscape and potential supply disruptions could lead to supply reliability risks, necessitating strategic procurement planning.
It is advisable for consumers to consider hedging strategies to lock in current prices, especially with the bearish sentiment in the market. Additionally, the increase in product inventories may provide a buffer against price spikes, but vigilance is required as market conditions can shift rapidly.
The Crude Oil market is currently characterized by a bearish sentiment driven by geopolitical uncertainties and fluctuating demand forecasts. The balance of supply and demand indicates a slight oversupply, particularly with OECD commercial inventories rising, which could suppress prices in the short term.
However, the bullish positioning of managed money traders suggests potential upward price movements if geopolitical tensions escalate. Analysts should focus on the interplay between machine learning forecasts and traditional market indicators to gauge potential shifts in market dynamics effectively.