MA(9): $70.11
MA(20): $77.43
MACD: -6.4072
Signal: -6.0872
Days since crossover: 30
Value: 28.9
Category: OVERSOLD
Current: 48,758
Avg (20d): 217,706
Ratio: 0.22
%K: 11.31
%D: 7.35
ADX: 29.67
+DI: 12.66
-DI: 30.09
Value: -88.69
Upper: 93.7
Middle: 77.43
Lower: 61.16
| Category | Current | Last Week | Last Year | 3 Yr Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude Production (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 13810.0 | 13819.0 | 13435.0 | 13011.0 |
| Crude Imports (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 5279.0 | 5570.0 | 5944.0 | 6834.67 |
| Crude Exports (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 4008.0 | 4669.0 | 4270.0 | 3535.67 |
| Refinery Inputs (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 17196.0 | 17111.0 | 16987.0 | 16642.33 |
| Net Imports (Thousand Barrels a Day) | 1271.0 | 901.0 | 1674.0 | 3299.0 |
| Commercial Crude Stocks (Thousand Barrels) | 408359.0 | 412134.0 | 415106.0 | 439890.67 |
| Crude & Products Total Stocks (Thousand Barrels) | 1527225.0 | 1533511.0 | 1633245.0 | 1635609.0 |
| Gasoline Stocks (Thousand Barrels) | 213966.0 | 216299.0 | 227938.0 | 227751.33 |
| Distillate Stocks (Thousand Barrels) | 108599.0 | 106116.0 | 105332.0 | 112238.67 |
Brent crude (SEP 26) settled at $71.8, change $+0.23. WTI crude (AUG 26) settled at $68.69, change $+0.11. The Brent-WTI spread is currently $3.11 (Brent premium of $3.11). The Brent-WTI spread reflects differences in global vs. U.S. supply/demand dynamics, geopolitics, and transportation costs.
In January, the OPEC Reference Basket (ORB) value rose by $0.61/b, month-on-month (m-o-m), to average $62.31/b. The ICE Brent front-month contract rose by $3.10/b, m-o-m, to average $64.73/b, and the NYMEX WTI front-month contract increased by $2.39/b, m-o-m, to average $60.26/b. The GME Oman front-month contract rose by $0.83/b, m-o-m, to average $62.79/b. The Brent–WTI front-month spread rose by $0.71/b, m-o-m, to average $4.47/b.
The forward curves of all major crude benchmarks strengthened, with the front end of the curves for both ICE Brent and NYMEX WTI moving into stronger backwardation. Oil supply outages, easing selling pressure from speculators, and robust physical market fundamentals supported front-month contracts. The forward curve for GME Oman was little changed, m-o-m. Speculative sentiment turned bullish, with hedge funds and other money managers sharply increasing their net long positions.
The global economic growth forecasts remain unchanged from last month’s assessment at 3.1% in 2026 and 3.2% in 2027. The US economic growth forecast is revised up slightly to 2.2% for 2026, but remains at 2% for 2027. In the Eurozone, the economic growth forecasts remain at 1.2% for both 2026 and 2027. Japan’s economic growth forecasts remain at 0.9% for both 2026 and 2027. The economic growth forecasts for China remain at 4.5% for both 2026 and 2027. India’s economic growth forecasts remain at 6.6% for 2026 and 6.5% for 2027. Brazil’s economic growth forecasts remain at 2.0% for 2026 and 2.2% for 2027. Russia’s economic growth forecasts remain at 1.3% for 2026 and 1.5% for 2027.
The global oil demand growth forecast for 2026 remains at 1.4 mb/d, year-on-year (y-o-y), unchanged from last month’s assessment. The OECD is forecast to increase by 0.15 mb/d, while the non-OECD is forecast to grow by about 1.2 mb/d. In 2027, global oil demand is forecast to grow by about 1.3 mb/d, y-o-y, unchanged from last month’s assessment. The OECD is forecast to grow by 0.1 mb/d next year, while the non-OECD is forecast to increase by about 1.2 mb/d, y-o-y.
Non-DoC liquids production is forecast to grow by about 0.6 mb/d, y-o-y, in 2026, unchanged from last month’s assessment, mainly driven by Brazil, Canada, US, and Argentina. In 2027, non-DoC liquids production is forecast to grow by about 0.6 mb/d, unchanged from last month’s assessment, mainly driven by Brazil, Canada, Qatar, and Argentina. Natural gas liquids (NGLs) and non-conventional liquids from countries participating in the DoC are forecast to grow by 0.1 mb/d, y-o-y, in 2026, to average about 8.8 mb/d, followed by similar growth in 2027 of about 0.1 mb/d, y-o-y, to average about 8.9 mb/d. In January, crude oil production by countries participating in the DoC decreased by 439 tb/d, m-o-m, to average about 42.45 mb/d.
In January, refining margins declined in all reported trading hubs. Stronger feedstock prices and seasonal demand-side pressures weighed on refining margins, despite a significant rise in offline capacity due to the severe winter in the Atlantic basin and extended maintenance in Asia. In the US Gulf Coast (USGC), losses stemmed from the bottom section of the barrel as increased availability of heavy crude supplies weighed on fuel oil and, to a more limited extent, on gasoil crack spreads. In Rotterdam, all key product margins declined, with gasoline leading the decline, followed by fuel oil. In Singapore, the decline was driven by elevated gasoline and jet/kerosene supplies in the region.
Dirty tanker spot freight rates had a strong start to the year in January, supported by weather disruptions, geopolitical uncertainties, unplanned outages, and steady loading activity. VLCC spot freight rates began in 2026 with an exceptionally strong performance, which spilled over into the smaller vessel classes. Spot freight rates on the Middle East-to-East route reached the highest level for the month in at least a decade, up by 64%, y-o-y. Suezmax rates rose amid weather disruptions in the Atlantic basin and spillover support from the VLCC market. Suezmax rates on the USGC-to-Europe route were up by 12%, m-o-m, more than double year-ago levels, as European refiners sought replacements for disrupted CPC flows. Aframax spot freight rates also experienced a strong performance in January, as a cold blast tied up tonnage in the Atlantic basin. Cross-Med Aframax spot freight rates rose by 10%, m-o-m, to reach a 10-year high for the month. In the clean tanker market, spot freight rates showed a strong performance, led by East of Suez. Rates on the Middle East-to-East route were up by 17%, m-o-m, while rates around the Mediterranean gained 5%, m-o-m.
US crude imports averaged 6.3 mb/d in January, remaining in line with the latest five-year average. US crude exports rose by almost 0.2 mb/d, m-o-m, to average 4.2 mb/d, amid higher flows to Europe and Africa. Product exports from the US averaged 7.0 mb/d, down from the elevated levels seen over the previous two months. In December, crude imports into OECD Europe declined, m-o-m, driven by lower flows from Kazakhstan. Product exports picked up from the previous month on higher inflows of fuel oil and diesel. In Japan, crude imports surged, averaging just under 3 mb/d in December, the highest since March 2020. Product imports, including LPG, reached a four-month high, led by kerosene and LPG, supported by winter fuel demand. China’s crude imports surged to a record high in December, averaging 13.2 mb/d. China’s product imports declined by 3%, as naphtha inflows fell from record levels seen in the previous month. Product exports from China rose marginally, as a jump in fuel oil exports was partly offset by a drop in gasoline flows. India’s crude imports remained at elevated levels in December, averaging 5.1 mb/d, despite a slight decline, m-o-m. Product imports declined by 5%, m-o-m, to average 1.2 mb/d, as a drop in fuel oil and naphtha inflows was offset by higher LPG imports. India’s product exports were broadly unchanged at 1.4 mb/d.
Preliminary December 2025 data show that OECD commercial oil inventories rose by 6.5 mb, m-o-m, to stand at 2,845 mb. At this level, OECD commercial stocks were 89.9 mb higher, y-o-y, and 44.1 mb above the latest five-year average, but 81.0 mb below the 2015–2019 average. Within the components, crude stocks fell by 2.1 mb, while product stocks increased by 8.6 mb, m-o-m. OECD crude oil commercial stocks stood at 1,363 mb. This was 75.5 mb higher, y-o-y, and 17.5 mb above the latest five-year average, but 64.2 mb lower than the 2015–2019 average. OECD total product stocks stood at 1,481 mb. This was 14.4 mb higher, y-o-y, and 26.7 mb above the latest five-year average, but 16.9 mb lower than the 2015–2019 average. In terms of days of forward cover, OECD commercial stocks rose by 0.7 days, m-o-m, in December, to stand at 62.8 days. This was 1.8 days higher than in December 2024, unchanged relative to the latest five-year average, and 0.5 days higher than the 2015–2019 average.
The demand for DoC crude in 2026 remains unchanged from the previous month’s assessment of 43.0 mb/d, which is about 0.6 mb/d higher than that of 2025. The demand for DoC crude in 2027 also remains unchanged from the previous month’s assessment of 43.6 mb/d, which is about 0.6 mb/d higher than the 2026 forecast.
| Year | World Demand (mb/d) | Non-DoC Supply (mb/d) | DoC Requirement (mb/d) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 106.5 | 63.5 | 43.0 |
| 2027 | 107.9 | 64.3 | 43.6 |
The analysis indicates a significant supply-demand gap for DoC crude in 2026, with a requirement of 43.0 mb/d against a world demand of 106.5 mb/d and non-DoC supply of 63.5 mb/d. This gap necessitates strategic production decisions to ensure market stability and address potential shortages.
CFTC Commitment of Traders Report (Disaggregated) as of 2026-06-23
Crude Oil Positioning (WTI-PHYSICAL - NYMEX):
Open Interest: 1,911,877 contracts (-95,832)
Managed Money Net Position: 82,872 contracts (4.3% of OI)
Weekly Change in Managed Money Net: -13,356 contracts
Producer/Merchant Net Position: 378,876 contracts
Swap Dealer Net Position: -531,482 contracts
Market Sentiment (based on Managed Money): Bullish but Weakening
Positioning Analysis (Managed Money): Normal Range
Key Takeaways:
- Managed Money traders are large speculators, often driving price trends in Crude Oil.
- Producer/Merchant positions primarily reflect hedging activity.
- Swap Dealers act as intermediaries.
- Extreme positioning by Managed Money can indicate potential market reversals.
- CFTC data reports positions as of the report date, usually released each Friday.
About Disaggregated CoT Reports:
The Disaggregated CoT report provides a more detailed breakdown of futures market open interest.
It categorizes traders into: Producer/Merchant/Processor/User (Commercials), Swap Dealers, Managed Money (Speculators), and Other Reportables.
| Date | Prediction | Lower Bound | Upper Bound |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-03 | $68.43 | $63.86 | $72.99 |
| 2026-07-04 | $68.58 | $64.02 | $73.14 |
| 2026-07-05 | $68.45 | $63.89 | $73.02 |
| 2026-07-06 | $68.34 | $63.78 | $72.91 |
| 2026-07-07 | $68.37 | $63.81 | $72.93 |
Current market conditions indicate a bearish sentiment, with a sentiment score of -0.600 reflecting concerns over easing global oil supply risks. The Brent-WTI spread is currently at $3.11, suggesting potential opportunities for arbitrage but also highlighting the divergence in supply/demand dynamics between global and U.S. markets.
With the Brent front-month contract averaging $64.73/b and WTI at $60.26/b, traders should monitor Fibonacci levels for potential resistance around $65 for Brent and $62 for WTI. The recent increase in managed money net positions indicates speculative interest, but the weakening bullish sentiment suggests caution in entering long positions.
Producers should consider the implications of the current inventory levels, with OECD crude stocks at 1,363 mb, indicating a year-on-year increase. This may impact production planning and hedging strategies, particularly as the demand for DoC crude is projected to rise in the coming years.
The bearish sentiment in the market, alongside declining refining margins, suggests that producers may need to reassess pricing strategies to maintain profitability. The decrease in crude oil production from DoC countries by 439 tb/d could present opportunities for producers to capture market share if supply constraints persist.
Consumers should prepare for potential input cost fluctuations, as the prices of Brent and WTI are currently influenced by geopolitical factors and supply reliability. With Brent at $64.73/b and WTI at $60.26/b, it's crucial to monitor these levels for procurement strategies.
The declining refining margins may affect the availability and pricing of refined products, necessitating a review of procurement contracts and potential hedging measures. Additionally, the recent surge in crude imports in regions like Japan and China indicates a competitive landscape for sourcing crude oil.
The current Crude Oil market reflects a complex interplay of factors. The bearish sentiment is primarily driven by easing supply risks and a decline in refining margins, while the increasing managed money positions suggest speculative interest that could lead to volatility.
Key driving factors include global oil demand growth forecasted at 1.4 mb/d for 2026 and 1.3 mb/d for 2027, alongside stable economic growth projections. Analysts should focus on the implications of these trends for pricing, supply-demand dynamics, and potential shifts in market sentiment as geopolitical factors evolve.